IIEF-15: unsuitable for assessing erectile function of young men?

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) is mainly studied in older males, whereas we measured prevalence of ED in young healthy males using a validated questionnaire. AIM: Assessing the prevalence of ED in young adult men using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and creating a benchmark for ED in this young age group for further research. METHODS: Male students were randomly asked to participate. Men with history of sexual dysfunction or urologic disease were excluded. Age, having a relationship and the IIEF-15 were filled out anonymously and in private. Outcomes of all domains were separately analysed based on relationship and intercourse frequency. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ED measured by the IIEF-15. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one students, aged 21.8 years (17-35, SD 2.98) participated and 14 were excluded. Of 137 students, 81% reported to have an intimate relationship. ED appeared to be present in 46 students (33.6%). The answer "no sexual activity," resulting in a 0-score, was given inconsistently. Outcomes were analysed for students who gave this answer at least once compared with those who never did. Nobody had ED in the group "without 0-scores" (n = 91). All students in the group "with (inconsistent) 0-scores" (n = 46) had ED. Students with a relationship had ED in 24.3% compared with 73.1% in those without a relationship (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When men with inconsistently answered IIEF-15 questionnaires are excluded, a 0% prevalence of ED is found in this age-group. The current scoring method however does not state that these questionnaires should be excluded, and results in a prevalence of ED of 34%. Possibly, the scoring method of the IIEF-15 needs to be reviewed when this questionnaire is used in young, healthy men in order to accurately measure the prevalence of ED.

Long-term followup of hypospadias: functional and cosmetic results.

PURPOSE: We assessed long-term results after hypospadias surgery with respect to urinary and sexual function, cosmetic appearance and intimate relationships. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 116 patients who are now adults and who underwent surgery between 1987 and 1992. Participation included mailed questionnaires containing the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function and the Dutch Survey of Intimate Relations (Nederlandse Relatie Vragenlijst) as well as uroflowmetry and cosmesis assessment using the Pediatric Penile Perception Score. A control group of 151 male students completed the International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function, and underwent uroflowmetry. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients (78%) were traceable, 57% returned the questionnaires and 27% visited the clinic. Hypospadias was distal, mid shaft and proximal in 47, 8 and 11 patients, respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score was greater than 7 in 9 of 64 patients (14%) compared to 10 of 151 controls (7%). Patients with distal hypospadias complained more about micturition. Patients with proximal hypospadias had lower maximum urine flow than other patients and controls. For sexuality the total International Index of Erectile Function did not differ between patients and controls. Patients with proximal hypospadias reported less satisfaction with penile length and objectively penile length was less than the average of all patients (10.8 vs 12.1 cm). Cosmetic outcome was considered satisfactory. Outcomes in the 33 patients who returned the Dutch Survey of Intimate Relations correctly were above average, especially for sexuality and independence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with distal hypospadias have a higher International Prostate Symptom Score and patients with proximal hypospadias have lower maximum urine flow than controls. Sexual function and cosmesis are rated good. The quality of intimate relationships is above average.